-Caveat Lector-

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


It's about time -- his work has been ripped to shreds even by the anti-gun crowd.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Author of Gun History Quits After Panel Faults Research

October 27, 2002
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS






ATLANTA, Oct. 26 - An Emory University professor has
resigned after an academic panel released a report strongly
critical of his research for a widely debated book about
the history of guns in America.

The professor, Michael A. Bellesiles, said in a statement
that he "cannot continue to teach in what I feel is a
hostile environment."

Mr. Bellesiles said the controversy surrounding his book,
"Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture,"
had made it impossible for him to continue his research.

Emory officials said Mr. Bellesiles' resignation would take
effect Dec. 31. He has been on paid administrative leave
this semester.

The 40-page report, released on Friday, concluded that
Professor Bellesiles had been "guilty of unprofessional and
misleading work."

The report, written by scholars from Harvard, Princeton and
the University of Chicago, said that Mr. Bellesiles's
failure to cite sources for critical data "does move into
the realm of falsification." It also suggested that he had
omitted other researchers' data that contradicted his
arguments.

Mr. Bellesiles denied the contentions. "I have never
fabricated evidence of any kind nor knowingly evaded my
responsibilities as a scholar," he said.

Mr. Bellesiles's book received national attention for its
contention that early Americans did not own or use firearms
in great numbers.

Gun-rights advocates criticized the book, and scholars
suggested the author had made serious errors, prompting
Emory to form the investigative panel in February.

One finding that led to the investigation concerned
historical records.

Professor Bellesiles said that he had studied more than
11,000 probate records in 40 counties around the country
and that he had found that from 1765 to 1790, only 14
percent of estate inventories listed guns. He said that
"over half (53 percent) of these guns were listed as broken
or otherwise defective."

Those figures are featured prominently in the book and were
cited in many reviews as the core of its argument.

But those who tried to examine the research found that they
could not, because most of Mr. Bellesiles's records, he
said, had been destroyed in a flood. The records they could
check showed many errors, almost all supporting his thesis.


Professor Bellesiles is one of several historians and
professors accused recently of academic fraud.

In June, Doris Kearns Goodwin, a former Harvard professor,
resigned from the Pulitzer Prize board, months after she
acknowledged that parts of a book she wrote were from
another author without attribution.

In February, Prof. Louis W. Roberts resigned as chairman of
the classics department and director of the doctoral
program in humanistic studies at the State University at
Albany, in New York. He had been accused of plagiarizing
more than 50 pages of Latin translations from two other
scholars.

In January, the historian Stephen Ambrose, who died earlier
this month, acknowledged that some sentences in his best
seller "The Wild Blue" were copied from "Wings of Morning,"
another book about World War II bomber pilots that was
written by Thomas Childers, a professor at the University
of Pennsylvania.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/27/education/27BOOK.html?ex=1036687191&ei=1&en=1f3c6906e5064b39



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to