-Caveat Lector-

From

World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org




WSWS : News & Analysis : North America

US returns to triple-digit budget deficits

By Patrick Martin
31 October 2002

Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author

The Bush administration announced October 24 that the federal budget deficit for the 
fiscal
year ending September 30 was $159 billion. If excess receipts for Social Security,
supposedly earmarked for paying future benefits, were excluded, the latest federal 
deficit
would top $300 billion.

The deficit is a huge shift from the $127 billion surplus in the previous fiscal year, 
which
began while Clinton was still in the White House and ended just before the US launched
military action against Afghanistan, on October 7, 2001. The $286 billion year-on-year
decline in the net budget balance was the largest ever recorded.

The widening deficit is largely the product of the biggest one-year drop in tax 
receipts since
World War II, a decline of 6.6 percent, or $131 billion. The fall in tax collections 
was only
partly the result of the Bush administration�s record tax cut for the wealthy, since 
the bulk of
the $1.35 trillion cut takes place in the latter part of the decade. A bigger factor 
was the
collapse of the stock market bubble, which sharply reduced federal receipts from the 
capital
gains tax and other taxes on wealth.

The Bush administration�s budget director, Mitch Daniels, said that previous 
projections of
huge federal budget surpluses for the next decade had been invalid because they were
based on the one-time windfall from the market bubble. �It�s now clear that the 
unexpected
surge in revenues toward the end of the last decade was temporary, and that revenues 
are
returning to historic levels for reasons unrelated to legislated changes,� he said.

While this is a transparent attempt to obscure the contribution of the Bush 
administration
tax cut to the rising deficit, Daniels� admission actually puts the tax cut in an even 
worse
light. The main argument advanced by the Bush administration to justify the cuts was 
that
budget surpluses would continue indefinitely, and basic social programs such as Social
Security could be maintained intact at the same time that income tax rates were sharply
reduced.

The argument for tailoring the tax cuts to overwhelmingly benefit the rich was 
unabashedly
anti- democratic: namely, that the government should return the bulk of �excess� 
revenues
to those in the highest income brackets, whose total tax payments were the greatest.

Now Daniels concedes that the massive budget surpluses were illusory.

Both the Congressional Budget Office and the Bush administration�s Office of Management
and Budget predict triple-digit deficits will continue in the current fiscal year, 
with the CBO
forecasting a $145 billion deficit and the OMB $109 billion. Both figures could prove 
wildly
optimistic in the event of a further collapse in financial markets or a long and 
costly war in
the Persian Gulf.

Three factors account for the skyrocketing deficits: the economic slump, especially in
financial markets; the Bush tax cut; and the huge rise in military spending that began 
with
the war in Afghanistan and continues in the buildup to war with Iraq.

The Bush administration has sought to divert attention from this basic reality by 
claiming
that excess congressional spending on domestic programs is the main contributor, 
although
the differences between various House and Senate versions of the FY 2003 budget and the
amounts requested by the White House are relatively small�only $9 billion, by one
estimate.

The consequences of the looming budget crisis go virtually unmentioned in the 2002
congressional campaigns of both Democratic and Republican politicians. But as soon as 
the
November 5 election is past�perhaps as soon as November 22, when a lame-duck session
of Congress is expected to open�the Bush administration will begin seeking cuts of 
tens of
billions of dollars in domestic social spending to reduce the deficit.

House Republican and Senate Democratic leaders must call the lame-duck session because
only 2 of 13 appropriations bills have passed by both houses of Congress�those funding
the Pentagon and military construction projects. The rest of the federal government is
functioning without budgetary authority since October 1, sustained only by a continuing
resolution that allows spending within rigid limits until late November. The budget 
deadlock
is the worst since 1995-96, when large portions of the federal government were shut 
down
in a conflict between the Republican-controlled Congress and the Clinton White House.

Two leading congressional Democrats, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad of
North Dakota and his House counterpart, John Spratt of South Carolina, urged the White
House to convene an emergency budget summit after the elections.

The budget deficit will only worsen as the full impact of the 2001 tax cut begins to 
be felt.
But neither of the two parties has suggested that any portion of the tax cut be 
reversed.
Congressional Republicans and the Bush administration are considering the introduction 
of
additional tax cuts for the wealthy if they regain control of the Senate on November 
5. The
Republican- controlled House has approved $448 billion in additional tax cuts so far 
this
year, but all have been stymied in the Senate. Treasury Secretary Paul O�Neill is 
lobbying
for elimination of the corporate income tax cut as the main priority for 2003.

House Democratic Leader Richard Gephardt proposed a five-part economic stimulus plan
October 15 which proposed no changes in the previously adopted tax cuts targeted to the
wealthy, calling instead for $75 billion in new tax cuts, divided between low-income 
workers
and businesses that invest in new plants or equipment. His plan also calls for $75 
billion in
health care subsidies for hospitals, state governments and the unemployed, $25 billion 
in
federal aid to states for anti- terrorist measures, and $25 billion for new school
construction.

The total of $200 billion is pathetically inadequate from a fiscal standpoint�less 
than 2
percent of the $11 trillion US economy�and less than half would actually be aimed at
unmet social needs.







Copyright 1998-2002
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; I don't believe everything I read or send
(but that doesn't stop me from considering it; obviously SOMEBODY thinks it's 
important)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without 
charge or
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of 
information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to