-Caveat Lector-
 
-----
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:06 PM
Subject: Police State America?? "Your brain may soon be used against you"

Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:25:55 -0600 (CST)
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Philadelphia Inquirer | 10/29/2002 | Your brain may soon be used against you

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/4391614.htm


Thought Police

Posted on Tue, Oct. 29, 2002
Your brain may soon be used against you
By Faye Flam
Inquirer Staff Writer


RON CORTES / InquirerRuben Gur, a Penn scientist, says brain scanners
could be used in criminal interrogations. He says privacy concerns
should not overshadow potential benefits in understanding better how the
mind works.

The last refuge of secrets and lies - the brain - may be about to reveal
all.

Scientists are finding ways to use the brain's activity to expose truths
a person may try to hide. The techniques could revolutionize police
work, improve national security, and threaten personal privacy.

"It's the scariest thing around," said physicist Robert Park, an
outspoken critic of old-fashioned, unreli! able polygraph machines.

"The only thing worse than a lie detector that doesn't work is one that
does."

Ruben Gur, a neuropsychologist at the University of Pennsylvania, says
new kinds of brain scans can reveal when a person recognizes a familiar
face, no matter how hard he or she tries to conceal it.

The scanning machine, called a functional MRI, takes pictures that
highlight specific parts of the brain activated during certain tasks.
Telltale parts of your brain "light up," he said, when you are presented
with a face you have seen before.

It is easy to imagine such scanners being used in interrogation of
criminal suspects or terrorists about their associates. Gur described
just such possibilities for national security experts at a recent Penn
workshop.

"Everything we do, and everything an enemy does, starts in the brain,"
he said at the Penn meeting, sponsored by the newly formed Institute for
Strategic A! nalysis and Response, which includes Penn epidemiologists,
germ-warfare specialists, political scientists, and computer experts.

Such scanning could also be used to pick up brain abnormalities that he
says characterize those prone to violence.

Another Penn scientist, Daniel Langleben, has found that a functional
MRI can act as a lie detector. A handful of other scientists around the
country are examining ways to read thoughts by examining the brain.

"In the long term, I think we will have technologies powerful enough to
understand what people are thinking in ways unimaginable now," Langleben
said. "I think in 50 years we will have a way to essentially read
minds."

He said he was not particularly happy about that. Neither are others
concerned about the unprecedented threat to humanity's most private
realm.

Gur acknowledges the concerns about brain scans eventually revealing
private thoughts.

The balance ! between security and privacy is something society will have
to come to grips with in many areas, he said.

A long quest
To Gur and Langleben, visions of Orwellian thought police do not
overshadow the potential benefits and the ever-tantalizing scientific
prospect of understanding how the mind works.

Gur said this work grew out of a long-standing quest to understand the
nature of conscious thought. When he set out to study consciousness, in
the 1970s, the concept was so hazy as to be out of the realm of
scientific inquiry.

With the advent of imaging machines such as MRIs, scientists found the
machines were capable of witnessing the brain in action by tracing the
way blood flowed to specific regions during various mental tasks. Gur
got in early, testing which of the many small structures inside the
brain were activated when test subjects were resting, reading words,
recognizing shapes, or trying to remember facts.

! The early machines used radioactive tracers that would "light up"
regions where metabolism was fastest. He went on a long diversion
exploring differences between the way men and women used their brains.
He found, among other things, that differences in the brain endowed
women with better memories and better control of emotions, while men
were more likely to be hot-headed.

In the last several years, he started focusing on the way the brain
responds to emotion.

Through a friend at the Arden Theatre Company, he brought together 140
Philadelphia-area actors.

Signs of recognition
He asked them to portray a range of emotions - happiness, sadness, fear,
anger and disgust.

He took pictures of the actors and showed them to volunteers whose
brains were being scanned by a functional MRI, which works by monitoring
the way molecules in the brain tissue respond to a magnetic field.

He isolated a number of centers in the! brain that were activated when
the volunteers looked at the emotional faces. Then he decided to show
the volunteers faces they had seen before mixed in with new faces, to
see if their brains registered recognition.

The familiar faces stimulated more activity than the new ones in several
areas, including the hippocampus, which regulates memory, and parts of
the visual cortex. He published his findings in the May issue of the
journal

NeuroImaging.
Investigators have long employed numerous methods to detect lies - voice
analysis, observations of body language and facial expressions, and the
polygraph, which measures changes in skin conductance and pulse rate.
Controversial since its invention, the polygraph fell further out of
favor this month when the National Academy of Sciences deemed it too
inaccurate for the government to use to screen people as potential
security risks.

"The polygraph only catches people who ar! e anxious about lying," often
letting through those who lie with ease, Gur said.

Langleben said he was inspired by studying children with attention
deficit disorder. He noticed that such children often had trouble
telling fibs - they would just blurt out whatever came into their minds
first, which was usually the truth. That led him to wonder whether the
part of the brain that helps control behavior also helped people to lie.

He found himself collaborating with Gur, who shared his interest.

They started with a standard test - called the "guilty knowledge test,"
used in polygraph studies. Volunteers were asked to choose a playing
card and put it in an envelope along with a $20 bill. The subjects were
hooked up to the scanner and asked a series of yes or no questions about
the identity of the card. They were told they would get the $20 if they
could fool the computer.

When the subjects lied, the scanner showed increased! activity in several
areas, including one called the anterior cingulate region, which Gur
said was activated by conflicting
information or errors. Also activated more in lying was a part of the
frontal cortex normally involved in making decisions. Finally, the
researchers also saw more activity in the part of the brain that
controls the right hand - since volunteers had to communicate their
answer by pushing buttons.

The scientists still cannot tell when each individual is lying - they
only get significant results when they average results from many
subjects. But they say they are getting closer to the ultimate goal of
lie-detecting: being able to tell individual truths from lies - and
truth-tellers from liars.

Contact Faye Flam at 215-854-4977 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

global peace now!
Global Peace NOW!
GLOBAL PEACE NOW!
    !



Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to