-Caveat Lector-
http://www.jihadunspun.net/newsarchive/article_internal.php?article=31885&list=/newsarchive/index.php&;
SATURDAY PROFILE Why I Oppose The US War On Terror: An Ex-Marine Sergeant
Speaks Out
Nov 02, 2002
Author: Chris White, Source: Counterpunch
We remind our viewers that the statements, opinions and points of view
expressed in this article are those of the author and shall not be deemed to
mean that they are necessarily those of Jihad Unspun, the publisher, editor,
writers, contributors or staff.
The more I juxtapose logical world opinion with the Bush administration's
actions in the war on terror, I realize one overwhelming theme: hypocrisy.
No one in any of the branches of government runs a physical risk to
themselves by entering a war with Iraq, and we can bet that none of their
family members are at risk, either. That is, until the next "terrorist"
attack. I put "terrorist" in quotes because its definition is subjective,
and I myself used to be in the Marine Corps, part of the most powerful
"terrorist" organization on the planet: the U.S. government. Of course, we
never call our operations "terrorism" because every operation is considered
legitimate to us. When found guilty by the World Court for violence in
Nicaragua, we ignore the decision. Too bad the nations we hurt can't just
ignore what we do to them. When the planet condemns us for killing between
2,500-4,000 people in Panama, we're too busy planning the next invasion of a
country that can't fight back.
I oppose this war as a U.S. citizen, a veteran, and a doctoral student in
history. While my military experience is what first made me skeptical about
our government's motives in the developing world, it wasn't until I went to
college and began reading hundreds of books and thousands of articles that I
was able to truly grasp the profundity of our leadership's contempt for the
freedoms they claim to protect. As a rule, we have worked hard to prevent
the rise of democracy in the developing world, all the while claiming
legitimacy as "the world's police force" because of our so-called
"democratic" values. The hypocrisy is astounding. When one investigates our
complicity in death squads, torture, massacres, rape, and mass destruction,
one realizes that freedom often threatens the current power structure in
this country.
I used to consider those incidents as anomalistic in comparison to the
"protection" we offered the planet at seemingly no charge. But then I joined
the Marines, and I realized why I had believed in the government: they were
experts in manipulation. Barely out of high school, the Corps broke us down
and built us up in order to shape us into machines, willing to defend the
ideals of the power elites in Washington and corporate America. Just look at
the companies, which are funding political campaigns, and benefiting from
war: weapons producers, technologies, food, clothing, munitions, oil,
pharmaceuticals, etc
U.S. interventions since WWII have not been done in the name of the world's
people (although that is always the claim), but for the preservation of
concentrated power. The fact that they have been carried out against the
tenets of international law (i.e. the rights of non-intervention and
self-determination), in itself deflates their validity. If the U.S.
government were held to the FBI's official definition of terrorism ("the
unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate
or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in
furtherance of political or social objectives"), their list of victims since
WWII alone would include:
Cuba, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras,
Guatemala, Panama, Mexico, Chile, Granada, Colombia, Bolivia, Venezuela,
Uruguay, Paraguay, Ecuador, Zaire, Namibia, Lebanon, Egypt, Greece, Cyprus,
Bangladesh, Iran, South Africa, the Philippines, Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Iraq,
Cambodia, Libya, Israel, Palestine, China, Afghanistan, Sudan, Indonesia,
East Timor, Turkey, Angola, and Somalia.
In boot camp, deceit and manipulation accompany the necessity to motivate
troops to murder on command. You can't take civilians from the street, give
them machine guns, and expect them to kill without question in a democratic
society; therefore people must be indoctrinated to do so. This fact alone
should sound off alarms in our collective American brain. If the cause of
war is justified, then why do we have to be put through boot camp? If you
answer that we have to be trained in killing skills, well, then why is most
of boot camp not focused on combat training? Why are privates shown videos
of U.S. military massacres while playing Metallica in the background, thus
causing us to scream with the joy of the killer instinct as brown bodies are
obliterated? Why do privates answer every command with an enthusiastic,
"kill!!" instead of, "yes, sir!!" like it is in the movies? Why do we sing
cadences like these?:Throw some candy in the school yard, watch the children
gather round. Load a belt in your M-60, mow them little bastards down!!" and
"We're gonna rape, kill, pillage and burn, gonna rape, kill, pillage and
burn!!"
These chants are meant to motivate the troops; they enjoy it, salivate from
it, and get off on it. If one repeats these hundreds of times, one
eventually begins to accept them as paradigmatically valid. The demonization
of the enemy is crucial to wartime planners, and the above examples of
motivation techniques are relevant to the present. Before carrying out a
security exercise in Qatar, my unit went through Muslim "indoctrination"
classes. The level of racism was unbelievable. Muslims were referred to as
"Ahmed," "towlheads," "ragheads," and "terrorists." We were told that most
Muslim males were homosexual, and that their hygiene was so primitive that
we shouldn't even shake their hands. The object was demonization through
feminization and dehumanization, so as to make it easier for us to pull the
trigger when ordered to. But Qatar is our ally, so imagine the language
being used today in these indoctrination courses about Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Iraqi population has suffered countless U.S. supported atrocities over
the past eleven years. Not only were between 100 and 200 thousand people
killed in 1991, but the bombing has continued ever since then, and sanctions
have led to the deaths of possibly 1 million people, in a nation of 17
million. Former UNSCOM execs assert that they destroyed 95-98 percent of
Saddam's weapons by 1998, and that a nuclear weapons capability is extremely
unlikely due to their devastated economy.
According to this morning's New York Times, the U.S. reasons that Saddam's
gassing of his own people and his hatred of the U.S. are what warrant our
harder stance toward Iraq in comparison to North Korea. While we pursue
diplomacy with North Korea (which has admitted to having nukes), we prefer
to invade Iraq, who we claim is only looking for nukes. Have we forgotten
the 1994 Congressional report revealing that we supplied Saddam with
biological and chemical weapons during the 1980s? Although U.S. casualties
will be lower than that of Iraq, let's not forget the danger we are placing
squarely on the shoulders of U.S. troops, who have been indoctrinated as I
was.
Funny how the people who are least likely to go to war are the ones working
the hardest to convince others to fight it for them!!
Editors Note: Chris White is an ex-Marine and current doctoral student in
history at the University of Kansas, Lawrence. He can be reached at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
