http://www.geobop.com/Wellstone/4/
The first thing that flashed through my mind when I learned that Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone had died in a plane crash on October 26, 2002, was “Conspiracy?!” I received e-mails from people thinking the same thing, and chatboards saw a brisk trade in conspiracy theories and pledges of revenge. According to one observer, “Over at the DemocraticUnderground.com, wild-eyed Wellstone death conspiracy theories spread like wildfire, with a full-blown ’Wellstone Assassination’ thread attracting some of the most outlandish commentary.”
Paul Wellstone’s name was added to the Bush Body Count within hours. The webmaster wrote, “Today, the media are putting on sad faces for the death of Senator Paul Wellstone, who died in a plane crash in Minnesota, along with wife Sheila, daughter Marcia, 3 members of his staff, and both pilots. The talking heads have all mentioned ’bad weather,’ but weather.com reported light drizzle, unlimited visibility and 3 mph winds just 2 hours after the crash. There was light snow reported earlier, but what Minnesota pilot could not fly under those conditions?”
Yet the words “conspiracy,” “murder” and “terrorism” were nearly absent from initial media reports, even when discussing public reactions. Wellstone’s plane allegedly offered no clues—it hit the marshy ground too hard, burned too intensely and wasn’t carrying a cockpit voice recorder. Was it all too convenient?
The media continuously reminded us of the “eerie similarities between the plane crashes that killed Wellstone and Senator Mel Carnahan in Missouri on October 16, 2000, even as they eerily avoided mentioning even eerier coincidences. Some articles mentioned the plane that disappeared in “Alaska’s “Bermuda Triangle” in 1972, killing House Majority Leader Hale Boggs of Louisiana and Alaska Senator Nick Begich, but few mentioned the date—October 16—and even fewer mentioned that Begich was born in Eveleth, Minnesota—just two miles from where Wellstone died! Have you heard about the rumor that the government actually located the Boggs-Begich plane, and there may have even been two survivors? Did you know that Boggs was survived by two famous children—media whore Cokie Roberts and Thomas Boggs, a high-powered attorney and lobbyist in Washington, D.C. who was associated with another prominent Democrat killed in a plane crash, Ron Brown? Did you know that Bill Clinton is also associated with Thomas Boggs—and with the crash that killed his father?
If you’re looking for solid evidence that Paul Wellstone and his companions were (or weren’t) murdered, you won’t find it here. All I have to offer is a rambling analysis of circumstantial evidence and the best political plane crashes chart on the Internet, strung together with logic and speculation. I can’t even prove that the Watergate conspiracy really happened!
At this stage, I’m not even ready to proclaim that Wellstone’s death was probably the result of a conspiracy. But I think it’s a distinct possibility, for the following eleven reasons:
Suspicious Timing
The fact that Wellstone’s plane crashed just eleven days before the general election doesn’t prove anything, but it’s obviously suspicious, especially when so many other politicians were killed in plane crashes while campaigning for election.
Suspicious Engine Sounds
Though initial media reports focused on the weather, local witnesses reported hearing unusual sounds from the plane’s engine. This is what was reported in the article Death of Sen. Paul Wellstone: Steep dive, then crash (Mesabi Daily News, Oct. 26, 2002):“Two people who live near the airport told KARE-TV the plane appeared to be in trouble when it passed over their homes. Kim Hill said the engines sounded to him like they were struggling. Rod Allen said he could feel his trailer shake as the plane flew over, and that it sounded to him like the engine speed was falling.”Faulty weather is either an act of God or global warming, but mechanical problems could indicate sabotage.
A Plane Crash Trifecta
Shortly after the September 11 terrorist attacks, President George W. Bush began joking about hitting the trifecta. (Visit the White House’s website and type “trifecta” into the search function; notice that the word “laughter” often follows the reference to hitting the trifecta.) In soccer and hockey, a person who scores three goals in one game is said to have scored a hat trick. Similarly, a person who bets on a race and correctly picks not just the winner but the second- and third-place winners as well hits the trifecta. Thus, Bush was essentially saying he hit the jackpot when terrorists destroyed the World Trade Center.In a sense, the Wellstone crash can be thought of as a trifecta for anyone who might have sabotaged it. The media report that there is probably little, if any, evidence of the cause of the crash because of three key elements:
1) There was no cockpit voice recorder on the plane.
2) The plane hit with a very hard impact.
3) The plane was scorched by an “intense fire.”
I don’t know enough about plane crashes to analyze these statements in great depth, but they strike me as suspicious. Initial media reports discussed the desperate search for the cockpit voice recorder, suggesting it might be hard to find—even though the wreckage was confined to a very small area, and the plane looked relatively intact to me. In contrast, authorities claimed to have discovered a terrorist’s passport (or visa?) in one of America’s largest urban wildernesses after it miraculously survived a collision with a skyscraper, a fireball, then the collapse of the World Trade Center. Investigators recover black boxes from the ocean, for crying out loud! Eventually, the media reported that the plane wasn’t equipped with a cockpit voice recorder in the first place. Nevermind!Similarly, most planes that crash tend to hit the ground rather hard, and I don’t think it’s unusual for them to burst into flame—so why did the media emphasize a hard impact and intense fire? How could a small plane flying at a very low altitude strike marshy ground any harder than a far heavier commercial airliner plunging into dry land from a far greater height at a far greater speed? Photographs indicate that Wellstone’s plane was primarily in one piece, while some crashed airliners scatter debris for miles. And why would Wellstone’s plane burn with a greater than normal intensity—and why would the media report an intense fire without even speculating why it burned so intensely?I’m going to contact some individuals who know more about plane crashes than I do and get their opinions. Stay tuned.
A Plane Crash Pattern?
Many initial media reports noted the “zeerie similarities” between the plane crash that killed Paul Wellstone on October 26 and a crash that killed Senator Mel Carnahan of Missouri on October 16, 2000. Both men were Democrats campaigning for re-election.A number of media reports also featured sidebars focusing on other plane crashes that have killed politicians. Statistically, politicians would be expected to die at a greater rate than the rest of us simply because they travel by air far more than the average citizen. Similarly, many politicians probably spend more time in planes when campaigning for re-election than usual. But did Paul Wellstone spend more time in a plane during his re-election bid than during the preceding 5½ years, when he wasn’t running for re-election? What about Mel Carnahan?Since 1971, twelve plane crashes have killed eight prominent Democrats, compared to five prominent Republicans—one of whom is described as a liberal Republican. This simple statistic looks a lot more sinister when you factor in a few more statistics. For example, five of the Democrats were campaigning for election, compared to none of the Republicans. (At least, the references I read didn’t mention election campaigns in connection with the Republicans.)At least six of the fatalities—four Democrats and two Republicans—were major threats to powerful interests, all but one because of their issues or whistle-blowing, while a seventh was on a plane carrying other people who posed a threat to the ruling class.
Democratic Whistle-Blowers
Hale Boggs was chairman of the Warren Commission and was outspoken about his disagreement with the Commission’s conclusion that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by a lone gunman. He and Nick Begich (both killed in 1972) were also both major critics of FBI director J. Edgar Hoover—an infamously powerful and corrupt tyrant. Thirty years later, the Democrats had degenerated into a coalition of worms. One of the rare exceptions was Paul Wellstone, a sworn enemy of Big Business who was also widely considered President George W. Bush’s #1 enemy.
Republican Whistle-Blowers
The liberal Republican, John Heinz, was an outspoken opponent of the Vietnam War and became a strong proponent of health care, social services, public transportation, the environment and reconciliation with Cuba, while John Tower Republican was investigating the Iran/Contra scandal. They were killed on April 4 and April 5, 1991, respectively. Perhaps the government hired an assassin offering a two-for-the-price-of-one special.There were at least three other plane crashes that may have been associated with the Iran/Contra scandal, all occurring in 1988, though none involved elected officials and all occurred outside the United States (unless you consider Mexico a part of the U.S., as George W. Bush does).
Collateral Damage
George Collins (a Democrat), was on a plane carrying people associated with Watergate and who were in a position to embarrass the government. (One was even accused of blackmailing the government.) U.S. Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown was hated by Republicans not because he gave a damn about truth or justice but because he wielded so much power and was a major supporter of President Bill Clinton.
The Triangular Crash
The most intriguing crash is the one that killed Hale Boggs and Nick Begich in “Alaska’s Bermuda Triangle.” It occurred about the time the Watergate scandal broke, when Richard Nixon was campaigning for re-election. Boggs and Begich were whistle-blowers who stepped on some of the most sensitive toes in American history, blasting the Warren Commission (alias the JFK Cover-Up Commission) and J. Edgar Hoover. They might have similarly latched on to Watergate.This incident is wrapped in mystery after mystery, including revelations that the government may have located the plane and there may even have been two survivors. Unfortunately, the FBI (under J. Edgar Hoover) apparently wasn’t too interested in rescuing Hoover’s critics; go figure. The odd behavior of Boggs’ widow and children and the “rewards” that were seemingly heaped on them—including their powerful positions in government, media and law—also make one wonder. Factor in the Bill Clinton and Ron Brown connections, and you have one whopper of a whodunit.On a still eerier note, this crash occurred on October 10—the same day Missouri Senator Mel Carnahan was killed in a plane crash—and Begich was born in Eveleth, Minnesota, the town near where Paul Wellstone was killed. The final amazing thing is that, in the wake of Paul Wellstone’s death, the media glossed over this epic plane crash or studiously ignored it altogether.The “Watergate crash” of December 1972 is another strange one, though the most bizarre crashes of all may be the ones that appear to be pure accidents.Things get still more suspicious when you include political plane crashes that didn’t kill politicians. For example, there were three plane crashes in 1988 that may have been related to Ronald Reagan and George Bush Senior’s Iran/Contra scandal, including Pan Am Flight 103, which exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland.And don’t forget the four hijacked airliners that made history on September 11, 2001, after President George W. Bush left the barn doors open for a mob of terrorists armed with boxcutters. Powerful evidence suggests the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was downed with a missile, while many people believe whatever punched a hole in the Pentagon wasn’t a plane at all!To get to the point, I think I see a pattern emerging from all this carnage. To illustrate it more clearly, I created two tables, one listing just the plane crashes that killed prominent politicians, with minimum details, the other a much more detailed chart that includes crashes that killed intriguing people who weren’t elected officials.
Media Conspiracy
The media coverage of Paul Wellstone’s plane crash was lousy. The articles I read very strongly suggested that the plane probably crashed due to bad weather, and investigators might have a really hard time finding the cockpit voice recorder (though the plane was mostly intact). They also emphasized that the plane hit the marshy ground really hard, after which it burned in an intense fire, without explaining why it might have struck the ground harder or burned hotter than a typical plane crash. Then they informed readers that the plane wasn’t equipped with a cockpit voice recorder to begin with.I don’t live in Eveleth, Minnesota, and I’m no expert on plane crashes, but there have been a number of reports that the weather wasn’t as bad as the media reported. One or two articles in local papers reported testimony from witnesses that suggested mechanical problems, but the media at large apparently weren’t interested in interviewing local residents.The media repeatedly noted the “eerie similarities” to the plane crash that killed Missouri Senator Mel Carnahan (also a Democrat) on October 16, 2000. Only a few mentioned the crash in “Alaska’s Bermuda Triangle” that killed two Democrats on October 16, 1972, and only one or two local papers noted that one of them—Nick Begich—was born in Eveleth, Minnesota, just two miles from where Wellstone died. Again, the mainstream media apparently didn’t find this interesting.A list of prominent politicians killed in plane crashes was also standard fare. It mentioned a Democrat who died in another plane crash in 1972, but never mentioned that it was the infamous “Watergate crash,” which killed 45 people, including Dorothy Hunt, who starred in her own mystery. At least one list of plane crashes didn’t mention the Watergate crash at all.I’m not suggesting that the media should 1) tell the public that Wellstone WAS murdered, 2) claim that the Nixon administration murdered 45 people to stop Dorothy Hunt in her tracks, or 3) suggest that October 16 is a jinxed day. But they should have at least noted some of these events as eerie coincidences, just as they noted the “eerie similarities” between the Wellstone and Carnahan crashes. They also should have noted that many private citizens suspect Wellstone was murdered when they discussed public reactions.Next to the airplane crash near Eveleth, the worst tragedy was the media coverage.
Bush’s Prompt Non-Response
I haven’t yet found time to research this item, so bear with me. When he learned about the accident, President George W. Bush said, “I would like to express my deep condolences for the loss of the Senate. And also I would like to express my condolences to the bereaved family.”What caught my attention were reports that Bush was the first public official to comment on the plane crash. If true, then one might wonder if Bush knew about the impending crash beforehand, just as millions of people around the world believe he knew that four hijacked airliners were going to wreak havoc after he left the barn doors open for a band of terrorists armed with boxcutters.Wait a minute... I just received a news flash from ABC News: “CRAWFORD, Texas Oct. 30—The Associated Press, in an Oct. 25 story about reaction to the death of Sen. Paul Wellstone, erroneously attributed a quote to President Bush that actually came from Chinese President Jiang Zemin. Saying he had just learned of the crash, Jiang said: ’I would like to express my deep condolences for the loss of the Senate. And also I would like to express my condolences to the bereaved family.’”Well, that certainly puts things in a different light. The first public official to comment on Paul Wellstone’s death was a Chinese freedom fighter hanging out with Bush at his home away from the golf course. So what did George Bush say when he heard the news about Wellstone’s death? Or did the CIA tell him to put a lid on it because they knew he wouldn’t get invited to Wellstone’s memorial?
Republicans Benefit from Wellstone’s Death
Many people think the idea that Republicans murdered Paul Wellstone is preposterous because Democrats benefited from the resulting sympathy vote—in more states than Minnesota.First, I counsel caution before the votes are in. Remember, the election system is at least as corrupt as it was in 2000, and the Republicans may know something we don’t.In addition, Paul Wellstone represented more than a name on a ballot. Wellstone was the only member of Congress to vote against giving George W. Bush a blank check to force a regime change on Iraq. Conventional wisdom suggested that Wellstone had cut his throat politically. Yet Wellstone edged ahead of Coleman in the polls, apparently benefiting from his gutsy (and intelligent) stand.Imagine if Wellstone had won. He would have been more powerful than ever, with a six-year term lying ahead. A Wellstone victory would have encouraged reformers, activists, whistle-blowers and patriots across America. He might have even encouraged run-of-the-mill Uncle Tom Democrats to tackle righteous issues if they thought it would boost their power or bank accounts.Finally, assassinating Paul Wellstone would have had a chilling effect on patriotism. Sure, many people have rallied to the cause in his memory, but many others are saying, “Wait a minute—do I really want to risk my neck for democracy?”
Democrats Profited from Wellstone’s Death
Let’s face it—Democrats are pigs. They may not be quite as bad, on average, as Republicans, just as cancer isn’t quite as bad as AIDS. All of this begs the question: Did Democrats beat Republicans at their own game?Wellstone threatened Democrats because, unlike most of his colleagues, he wasn’t addicted to polls, he wasn’t spineless, and he had a clue about important issues. Wellstone also threatened the corporate interests that shore up corrupt Democrats and Republicans alike. Wellstone’s death may also help protect Democrats from future attacks. After the anthrax attacks on Daschle and other Democrats and a string of Democrats killed in plane crashes, culminating in Paul Wellstone’s tragic death, the Bush administration is going to have use extreme caution in assassinating Democrats in the future.So Wellstone’s death accomplished four things:
1) It empowered Democrats, largely through the sympathy vote.
2) It eliminated the greatest embarrassment to Democrats.
3) People who suspected a conspiracy instantly blamed Republicans.
4) It may have given Democrats some insurance against further assassinations.
A Demopublican Hit?
If Paul Wellstone’s death was the result of a conspiracy by either Republicans or Democrats, then, in a sense, both parties are partly to blame.Just as George W. Bush left the barn doors open for the terrorists who perpetrated the Attack on America, so have the Democrats given Republicans a blank check to murder democracy and America’s economy, with a few bodies thrown in for good measure. Bush might not even be President in the first place if the Democrats had come up with a better candidate than Al Gore, or if Bill Clinton hadn’t fiddled while American burned. Sure, we enjoyed great prosperity under Clinton, but, behind the scenes, democracy was rotting.And if Wellstone was assassinated by Democrats, It will probably never be proved that Wellstone’s death was an assassination. Nor can it ever be disproved. That the FBI was called in to investigate is a joke; is there anyone in America who still trusts the FBI? With virtually no institutions left that the public trusts, the entire Demopublican cartel will likely be blamed by liberal and conservative conspiracy theorists alike for eternity, in a cosmic Catch-22.
Calling Cards & Track Records
Of course, many people would be outraged by some of my theories. They can’t believe the government is capable of assassinating anyone, and all the wild coincidences I’ve pointed out are merely that—wild coincidences. After all, it would be utterly stupid to assassinate three politicians on the same date (October 16), right?I think the government is fully capable of murder and has murdered many people. I also think some of these wild coincidences may be more than coincidences. To understand how I arrived at this conclusion, first ponder the various types of killers and reasons for murder.
Why Do People Kill?
Of course, people kill in wartime, and they kill in self-defense just about any time. Killing while in uniform or in self-defense is generally considered relatively normal and isn’t punishable as a crime, except in unusual cases.We all know that people sometimes kill in passion—like anger or jealousy. They sometimes kill to prevent people from threatening their careers or reputations. They also kill in revenge (after someone broke their heart or ruined their career).Things get especially messy when love intrudes in politics, particularly when public trust or sensitive information may be compromised. That’s one reason people were upset by the Gary Condit-Chandra Levy affair. Curiously, far less media attention was focused on an even more disturbing death after a young woman named Lori Klausutis was found dead in the office of Florida Representative Joe Scarborough (a Republican). She worked for Scarborough, who had recently resigned form Congress prematurely amid rumors of marital infidelity. He had also resigned as publisher of the independent Florida Sun. He also got divorced. The media eventually claimed that Klausutis was felled by a heart condition that would have killed her even if she had not hit her head on a table. (See the News Herald, for example.) But some people thought it odd that a women with a heart problem would compete in marathons. There are still more strange things about the Klausutis case—including the almost unbelievable lack of media interest—which you can learn about at the American Politics Journal.People also kill to promote or protect political or social agendas. And they kill for money, be they mercenaries or Mafia hit men. Some people kill for other rewards, which may include respect or religion. Patriotism and religion are both typically exploited to entice people to fight in both war and terrorism.Finally, there are people who kill because they enjoy killing, or because they’re emotionally or mentally unstable.
Assassins, Serial Killers & Calling Cards
Murderers often intentionally leave clues. Serial killers and people who are mentally unstable may leave clues because they want to torment survivors. Others enjoy playing games with law enforcement, and still others want to get caught.Professional assassins, on the other hand, may leave clues that serve as a warning: If you make waves, the same death awaits you. Thus, some murders bear the marks of “mob hits,” while others appear to be the work of street gangs or psychopaths. Sometimes, calling cards are simply the manner of death—murder by gunshot, knife, plane crash or “suicide.”
Government, She Wrote
So, putting it all together, let’s now ask the following questions:
1) Does the government employ or contract with professional assassins, lunatics capable of murder or other people who might commit murder?
2) Why would they be asked or ordered to commit murder?
3) How would they carry out assassinations?
4) Has the government commissioned domestic assassinations?
The first question is answered by the last question. We all know the government has assassinated people in other nations, and you can’t have someone assassinated without hiring or contracting with an assassin.Does the government also recruit lunatics or psychopaths who are capable of murder? Well, consider President George W. Bush and Steven Hatfill, the prime suspect in the anthrax murders. Even if Hatfill isn’t guilty of distributing anthrax in the mail, it’s hard to understand how the government could recruit a white supremacist and a liar who networked with fellow bigots in Rhodesia and South Africa for a sensitive position working with biochemical weapons.Or consider all the public officials who have been involved in the murder of African Americans and Native Americans over the years, or the murders of civil rights activists, labor activists and “socialists” over the years. Anyone who thinks the U.S. government isn’t capable of committing murder is either ignorant, stupid or corrupt.But what about domestic assassinations of politicians and other powerful figures? It has never been proven that the government, Big Business or other special interests were behind the murder of John F. Kennedy, but I became a proud member of the Grassy Knoll Society a year or two ago. There are just too many unexplained mysteries, and the government is so corrupt, I find it hard to believe it wasn’t somehow involved in a cover up, if not the actual murder.Did President Bill Clinton order the assassination of Vince Foster? I don’t know, and I haven’t really studied that affair—but it wouldn’t surprise me if he did.But the George Bush cartel has emerged as America’s leading crime syndicate. Visit The Bush Body Count and check out the people associated with George Bush (Junior or Senior) who have died under mysterious circumstances. In fact, George Bush, Inc. may someday be credited as the source of a new word—“suicided.” The word is commonly used to describe people who have been assassinated but which are claimed to be suicides in the corporate media.Why the government would order an assassination is a nonsensical question. Why else? To prevent people from going public with information that might cause a politician, his party or his corporate backers to lose power or money or be prosecuted. But there is another potential motive behind political assassinations:Murdering people discourages others from speaking out.That explains my theory that the government may leave “calling cards” of sorts with some of its assassinations. It seems reasonable to speculate that the corrupt and the powerful would want to make the public think that taking a stand can cost them their lives. That could help explain some of the “eerie coincidences” that accompany so many political deaths. Of course, a corrupt politician wouldn’t want to be found out, so the calling card has to be fairly subtle and obscure and/or so obvious that the public believes it couldn’t possible be intentional.Many, if not most, of the more mysterious deaths of prominent politicians and their cronies (or whistle-blowers) appear to have resulted from plane crashes, gunshots, medical problems or suicides (which, in turn, may involve firearms).Similarly, there have also been many reports of activists being detained or otherwise harassed by the police, the FBI or airport security. Whether these incidents are true or are fabrications, they have a chilling effect on free speech. Combined with an occasional death of an unusually righteous and outspoken political figure (like Paul Wellstone), which is eerily similar to the death of other political figures, not to mention the Patriot Act and “hit lists” put together by the likes of Second Lady Lynne Cheney, it isn’t hard to understand why there’s such a paucity of candidates for public office these days, with a virtual absence of true, outspoken activists (which can be defined as just about anybody with any moral fiber and a penchant for speaking the truth). The corporate media complain about the lack of choices bitterly, though media whores like Cokie Roberts and the editorial staffs of most major newspapers are probably laughing their asses off behind closed doors.Just for the record, I don’t believe that all of these stories are fabrications. I’ve run for public office twice, and, though I was never threatened with death, I was victimized by some rather extraordinary manipulation. In particular, I was kicked out of a political forum at an elementary school (merely because I accused the incumbent of “sitting on her butt” while our public schools withered) and wasn’t allowed to speak at another forum (until I simply blurted out what I had to say). I also discovered that corrupt candidates were invited to forums the rest of us weren’t even told about, while there were no forums at all during my second campaign.
There may have been two previous attempts.
In 2000, Senator Paul Wellstone visited Colombia, becoming the first member of Congress to visit Barrancabermeja, dubbed Colombia’s most dangerous city by embassy officials. It was there that authorities discovered two land mines, which they believed targeted Paul Wellstone and the U.S. ambassador. Wellstone was also doused with an herbicide.Was an attempt made to assassinate Paul Wellstone? If so, who was behind it—the United States, Colombia, or both? Learn more about these twin accidents at CNN, ABC News and The Americas.org.
Loose Ends
Even if it was a Republican assassination, one might still put part of the blame on Democrats’ shoulders. Just as George W. Bush left the barn doors open for the terrorists who perpetrated the Attack on America, so have the Democrats given Republicans a blank check to murder democracy and America’s economy, with a few bodies thrown in for good measure.It will probably never be proved that Wellstone’s death was an assassination. Nor can it ever be disproved. That the FBI was called in to investigate is a joke; is there anyone in America who still trusts the FBI?Then again, Democrats could be held partly responsible even if it was a Republican assassination. And with virtually no institutions left that the public trusts, the entire Demopublican cartel will likely be blamed by liberal and conservative conspiracy theorists alike for eternity, in a cosmic Catch-22.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
