-Caveat Lector-


<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message --- -Caveat Lector-
 
8:24 A.M. -- The pilot of Flight 11, John Ogonowski, activates the
talk-back button, enabling Boston air traffic controllers to hear a
hijacker on Flight 11 say to the passengers: "We have some planes.
Just stay quiet and you will be OK. We are returning to the airport."
A controller responds, ''Who's trying to call me?'' The hijacker
continues, "Everything will be OK. If you try to make any moves you'll
endanger yourself and the airplane. Just stay quiet." [8:24:38,
Guardian, 10/17/01, 8:24:38, New York Times, 10/16/01, 8:24, Boston
Globe, 11/23/01, 8:28, New York Times, 9/12/01, before 8:28, Channel 4
News, 9/13/01] Immediately after hearing this voice, the controller
"knew right then that he was working a hijack." [Village Voice,
9/13/01] The transponder beacon and radio have been off for 10
minutes, the flight has been off course for about 4 minutes and only
now he knows its a hijack? Yet still, no one notifies NORAD for
another 14 minutes?  And jet fighters are not ordered to scramble
until 8:46, some 22 minutes after a hijacking is known with certainty
to be underway, and 29 minutes after the control tower loses contact
with the airliner.

 

8:46 A.M. -- Flight 77 from Washington goes severely off course.
According to FAA regulations a fighter should have scrambled to see
what was going on, regardless of any excuses from the pilot.  Flight
11 had just hit the North Tower of the WTC.  Fifty-five minutes later,
at 9:41, Flight 77 slams into the Pentagon.

Why, in the space of nearly an hour, with three airliners known to be
simultaneously hijacked and one of them already crashed into the World
Trade Center, are dozens of jet fighters not allowed to scramble, so
that they might quickly intercept any additional airliner that is
hijacked?   Why, in the space of nearly an hour, can no jet fighter
reach Flight 77 before it crashes into the Pentagon?
9:24 A.M. -- The FAA notifies NORAD that Flight 77 "may" have been
hijacked and appears to be headed towards Washington. [9:24, NORAD,
9/18/01, 9:24, AP, 8/19/02, 9:25, CNN, 9/17/01, 9:25, Washington Post,
9/12/01, 9:25, Guardian, 10/17/01].  This notification is 34 MINUTES
after flight control lost contact with the plane and well after two
planes have crashed, and even then the FAA only says "may"? Is such a
long delay believable, or has that information been doctored to cover
the lack of any scrambling of fighters?

9:33 A.M. -- According to the New York Times, Flight 77 was lost at
8:56 when it turned off its transponder, and stayed lost until now.
Washington air traffic control sees a fast moving blip on their radar
at this time and sends a warning to Dulles Airport in Washington. [New
York Times, 10/16/01].  Is it conceivable that an airplane could be
lost inside US air space for 37 minutes?  One doesn't need a
transponder signal to get a radar signal!  And if the plane was really
"lost" for all this time, then on what basis did the FAA warn that the
plane was headed towards Washington at 9:24?

And why is it that the Bush administration is so dead set against any
independent investigation of exactly what went wrong between the FAA
and NORAD on 9/11?
For more, go to:
www.unansweredquestions.net
 
   Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: petra patten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BCY2K] scrambled eggs

Hi

In regard to the intercepted airplanes there seems to be   quite some misunderstanding in the general public. The   general understanding (or should  we say: belief?) goes   that the airforce  did not send fighters up to intercept   the  hijacked planes.

That is wrong.

In    the  case  of  the first hijacked plane no.11 which finally  hit the worldtradecenter  at 8:45 two 7-15 pilots got informed at  8:40  to get ready to scramble up. And at 8:46 (other sources  talk of 8:44 or 8:45)they  took off to do their job. They took off to intercept the hijacked plane (all this information can be found on site: "The

complete 9/11 timeline" at:

<www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/index.htm).

Which of course was too late since the first tower got hit the same minute. But what this information tells us is the fact that the airforce did take action and indeed send fighters up to intercept!! They were absolutely aware of the hijackings and they took action. It is wrong to assume that they didn´t do anything. They knew and they acted as is known in regard to the flight no. 11 So the  question is altogether a different one: why did they  not do anything in regard to flights no 77 and 175 which  supposedly  destroyed the   second tower of the wtc and the  pentagon? The airforce knew of it and  had send two f-15 up to intercept flight no.11. Which reasons did  they have not to do the  same with the other 2 or 3 flights?

Guess why!

In  regard to flight no.175 which supposedly hit the pentagon the answer is simple. If  they would have send a pilot up to intercept the  plane there would  have been one eyewitness of what happened. Cause to me is fact that this plane did not crash into the pentagon. Having seen the pictures of the

pentagon  few  minutes after the destruccion had happened I  know  that  it can´t have been a boeing that destroyed it.

  But where did the plane end up after all? Was it flewn directly into the atlantic ocean or to a military airport? We don´t know yet - thanx to the airforce that did not send fighters scrambling up.

 My warmest regards

Petra



Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive medley & videos from Greatest Hits CD
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om --- End Message ---

Reply via email to