-Caveat Lector-

http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,56464,00.html

The British government acknowledged Monday that it would consider using
implanted ID chips to track sex offenders, raising the specter of forced
chipping.

The news was first reported on Sunday by the The Observer. The paper
reprinted portions of a letter from Hilary Benn, the minister responsible
for supervising sex offender programs, to Labour MP Andrew Mackinlay.

Benn's letter said the British government was interested in the future
potential of implants to track offenders' movements by satellite and
measure their heart rate and blood pressure "to predict criminal
activity."

Home Office spokesman Matt Brook on Monday confirmed both the existence of
the letter as well as its content.

"Yes, we're looking at tagging as an option," said Brook. "All the letter
is saying is that something like that would be worthy of consideration.
Anything that will help us stop these people from re-offending would be
welcome."

While not yet a reality, implants that can remotely check bodily functions
and location are just around the corner: Microchips are being developed
for a variety of health functions, and a Florida company is planning to
develop a prototype of an implanted GPS device by the end of the year.

When the Food and Drug Administration green-lighted the use of ID chips in
humans last month, civil liberties advocates worried that people could be
forced to get chipped as a condition of employment or parole. News that
the British government may implant sex offenders in the future fanned
those fears.

"At a certain point you cross the line from privacy concern to human
rights violation, and I think we're entering that territory," said Marc
Rotenberg, director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Even a nonprofit organization created to help victims of sexual assault
expressed ambivalence about the use of the technology.

"Is monitoring appropriate? Certainly. But I don't know that this level of
monitoring is appropriate," said Jamie Zuieback, spokeswoman for the Rape,
Abuse & Incest National Network. "There are questions of fairness and
there are questions of efficacy that need to be answered."

Home Office spokesman Brook said any plans to chip offenders would have to
pass muster with the British Parliament. The debate, he said, is far from
over.

"Clearly a careful balance has to be struck between protecting the
community and ensuring that sex offenders don't re-offend," said Brook.
"It's a very difficult area."

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to