-Caveat Lector- This article from NYTimes.com has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After 9-Month Break, U.N. Revives Plan for Khmer Rouge Trial November 21, 2002 By ELIZABETH BECKER After nine months, the United Nations revived plans yesterday for an international trial for the surviving leaders of the Khmer Rouge. They are charged with genocide and gross human rights violations in the deaths of more than one million Cambodians in the 1970's. But the resolution that ultimately passed in a key committee had been watered down to meet Cambodia's approval. Although it calls for resuming negotiations on creating a special crimes tribunal, it requires that such a tribunal adhere to 2 of the 53 articles of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The measure also notes with approval a new Cambodian law that insists that Cambodia's ill-trained and corrupt courts have the final say in the proceedings, rather than the United Nations. Sponsored by Japan and France, the measure passed the committee unanimously, with more than 100 voting for it 37 abstaining. It still faces a General Assembly vote, but is expected to pass. It was immediately criticized by several diplomats and rights advocates for failing to ensure that the trial would meet adequate international standards for fairness. "The resolution fails to include explicit language guaranteeing the tribunal will meet international standards, and it lacks a solid commitment from the Cambodians," said a senior diplomat whose country nevertheless voted for it. After four years of talks on a tribunal with Prime Minister Hun Sen's government, such complaints have become familiar. In February, deadlocks and disappointments over the tribunal led the United Nations to announce that the talks had stopped. Nations led by Australia, France, Japan and the United States worked to start another effort. Cambodia is one of relatively few countries to suffer such devastation since World War II without seeing those who carried out the actions brought to trial - despite the 23 years that have elapsed since the Khmer Rouge were overthrown. In that time, there have been trials or truth commissions for Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Africa and the former Yugoslavia. Secretary General Kofi Annan reconsidered. In August, he said he would resume talks if given a "clear mandate." The new resolution was intended to provide that mandate, but even its original sponsors disagreed over whether it was strong enough to ensure fairness. Australia withdrew its sponsorship at the last minute, when Cambodia called for changes. "We found the changes to weaken the text, but we were not prepared to vote against it," said Ambassador John Dauth of Australia. Scholars and rights experts said they feared that with so many governments eager to redress an omission, there had been more willingness to water down international law to win Cambodian approval. "This resolution does not even ask the Cambodian government to live up to the very minimum international standard for a fair trial, much less build in guarantees that those standards will be adhered to," said Stephen R. Heder, a Cambodia scholar at the University of London. Prime Minister Hun Sen, a minor Khmer Rouge military officer in the first years of the killings, engaged in drawn-out talks with the United Nations. Under his direction, Parliament passed a law to set up a tribunal. The measure had provisions unacceptable to the United Nations. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/21/international/asia/21CAMB.html?ex=1038871499&ei=1&en=8f7fd8ffdd8b516c HOW TO ADVERTISE --------------------------------- For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or other creative advertising opportunities with The New York Times on the Web, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo For general information about NYTimes.com, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
