-Caveat Lector-

"I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the REPUBLIC for which it stands,  one Nation under God,indivisible,with
liberty and justice for all."

 visit my web site at
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:50:22 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Americans Have a Right to Know

Americans Have a Right to Know About The Council on Foreign Relations by John
F. McManus (John Birch Society)

There exists in our nation today a privately-run organization with only 3,000
members, several hundred of whom are U.S. government officials. But even
though this organization possesses enormous influence over the actions of our
national government, most Americans have never heard of it.

This same organization's members dominate our nation's mass media,
multinational corporations, the banking industry, colleges and universities,
even the military. Yet its domination is unknown to the average citizen.

The members of this small but extremely influential group are responsible for
a parade of foreign policy disasters in China, Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua,
Panama, Cuba, and Africa. The group itself has always sought to lead the
United States into a one-world socialistic system led by its members and
their like-minded associates in other nations. Shouldn't you know about this
organization and what its members are planning for the l990s?

This article will introduce you to the Council on Foreign Relations, the
little-known New York City-based organization that is both the seat of the
liberal establishment and the main force pushing the United States into the
new world order.



CFR Wants One-World Socialism

It was a disappointed but determined group of diplomats from the United
States and England who gathered at the Majestic Hotel in Paris on June 17,
1919. Their disappointment stemmed from the U.S. Senate's rejection of
America's proposed entry into world government via the League of Nations. But
they remained determined to scrap the sovereignty of each of their nations,
and of all nations.

The leader of the U.S. contingent at this 1919 conference was President
Woodrow Wilson's top advisor, Edward Mandell House. In his 1912 book, Philip
Dru: Administrator, House laid out a plan for radically altering the American
system via what he termed a "conspiracy." The book revealed his ultimate
goal: "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx."

The Paris gathering led to the formation of the British Royal Institute for
nternational Affairs and the American Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
With Rockefeller and Carnegie money backing it, the CFR quickly attracted
influential Americans who used their influence to labor for the one-world
socialist goal. In 1939, the organization accepted a formal invitation to
establish a relationship with the U.S. State Department. That relationship
soon grew into CFR domination of the foreign policy of our nation.
Practically every Secretary of State for the past 50 years, serving both
Democratic and Republican Administrations, has held CFR membership.



Explicitly Stated Goal

As early as 1922, the CFR's prestigious journal, Foreign Affairs, brazenly
called for "world government" at the expense of our nation's independence.
Repeatedly airing this subversive goal over subsequent years, Foreign Affairs
published its most explicit call for the termination of U.S. sovereignty in
Richard N. Gardner's 1974 article entitled "The Hard Road to World Order."

Admitting that "instant world government" was unfortunately unattainable, the
Columbia University professor and former State Department official proceeded
to champion "an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by
piece." He also pointed to numerous international groups and causes, each of
which he claimed "can produce some remarkable concessions of sovereignty that
could not be achieved on an across-the-board basis."

At the time this article appeared, hundreds of CFR members were holding high
government posts. Those who were required to swear an oath to support the
Constitution of the United States should have immediately resigned from the
CFR. None did. Nor were any asked to do so by superiors in government.
Instead, the erosion of national independence and the undermining of the
Constitution continued.

CFR members like Gardner have historically helped similarly determined
world-government advocates achieve power in other nations. It didn't matter
to them whether foreign leaders were professed socialists, communists, or
whatever, as long as they shared Edward Mandell House' s goal of "Socialism
as dreamed of by Karl Marx." Marxism was the goal, and that has always meant
economic control of the people and world government.

Over the years, therefore, CFR members have carried out the Marxist goals of
their organization's founder when they helped one communist thug after
another take control of once-free nations. Now that communism is no longer
the favored route to socialist world government, CFR members have thrown the
weight of their considerable influence behind socialists and "former"
communists in Europe, Africa, and elsewhere. But they deserve condemnation
for the deaths of hundreds of millions killed by communist rulers, and for
the horror of life under communist dictatorships still endured by more than a
billion human beings.



Past Treachery

CFR members Owen Lattimore and Dean Acheson engineered the betrayal of Chiang
Kai-shek's government and the domination of the Chinese people by the
bloodiest murderers the world has ever known.

CFR members Dean Acheson and Dean Rusk arranged for the no-win undeclared war
in Korea, the removal from command of General MacArthur who sought victory,
and the establishment of Communist Red China as the primary military power in
Asia.

CFR members John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, filling top posts in the
Administration of CFR member Dwight Eisenhower, betrayed the Hungarian
Freedom Fighters in 1956 and knowingly aided communist Fidel Castro in his
successful seizure of Cuba in 1958-59.

CFR members McGeorge Bundy, Adlai Stevenson, and John J. McCloy saw to it
that the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion was a miserable failure, a huge boost for
Castro, and a stunning embarrassment for the United States.

CFR members Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara, and Henry Cabot Lodge pushed the
United States into Vietnam and drew up the rules of engagement for our forces
that made victory completely unattainable.

CFR members Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger continued those policies,
presided over America's total defeat in 1973, and allowed South Vietnam,
Laos, and Cambodia to be delivered to communist rulers.

CFR stalwarts Henry Kissinger, Ellsworth Bunker, and Sol Linowitz arranged
(with Senate approval) in 1978 to give away the U.S. canal in Panama to a
Marxist dictatorship and to sweeten the incredible deal with a gift of $400
million to take it.

CFR leaders Zbigniew Brzezinski, Cyrus Vance, and Warren Christopher
undermined strong U.S. allies in Nicaragua and Iran during the 1970's and
helped anti-American and Marxist leaders to power.

CFR members George Shultz, William J. Casey, and Malcolm Baldrige, during the
1980's, continued the policy of supplying U.S. aid which kept communists in
power in Poland, Romania, China, and the Soviet Union. These same individuals
did all they could to assist and dignify the Marxists in El Salvador,
Nicaragua, and South Africa. Wherever communist regimes failed, they sent
more U.S. aid to the socialists and one-worlders who came to power.

CFR leaders in the Administration of CFR veteran George Bush continued to
undermine the government of South Africa until it fell into the hands of
Marxist Nelson Mandela.

George Bush deliberately avoided the U.S. Congress and went to the United
Nations for authorization to unleash American military forces against Iraq in
1991. He pointedly stated that his goal was a "new world order ... a United
Nations that performs as envisioned by its

founders." The UN's founders, however, included 43 current or future members
of the CFR. A leader of the U.S. delegation and the secretary general of the
UN's founding conference in 1945 was future CFR member and secret communist
Alger Hiss.

CFR member Bill Clinton has followed the Marxist game plan called for by
Edward Mandell House by crusading for socialized medicine, an end to private
ownership of fire arms, and economic unions preceding world government
through NAFTA and GATT. President Clinton has also embarked on a deliberate
program, most notably via his April l994 Presidential Decision Directive 25,
which urges turning over control of U.S. military forces to the United
Nations.



Destroying Checks and Balances

Americans have always been assured that tyranny cannot be established in our
nation because of our Constitution's brilliant system of checks and balances.
In a round robin way, each of the three branches of government has the power
to check and limit the activities of the other two. This feature of the
Constitution did not materialize by chance. In the Federalist Papers, James
Madison wrote: "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive and
judiciary, in the same hand, whether of one, a few, or many, or whether
hereditary, self appointed or elected, may justly be pronounced the very
definition of tyranny." But through its members, the CFR is amassing exactly
the kind of tyrannical power Madison feared.

The Executive branch is led by CFR member Bill Clinton. His top appointees
include CFR members Warren Christopher, W. Anthony Lake, Bruce Babbitt, Henry
Cisneros, Lloyd Bentsen, Donna Shalala, R. James Woolsey, Madeleine Albright,
Alice Rivlin, Strobe Talbott, and a host of others.

The Legislative branch's Senate has been led by CFR members George Mitchell
(the Majority Leader until he retired), Patrick Moynihan, John D. Rockefeller
IV, John Chafee, Harris Wofford, Christopher Dodd, Larry Pressler, Bob
Graham, Williiam Cohen, Claiborne Pell, an others. The most important
officers of the House of Representatives are CFR members: Richard Gephardt
and Majority leader Newt Gingrich. In addition, there are more than a dozen
other members of the CFR serving in the House.

The Judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court and all federal district
and appeals courts. Of the nine justices of the nation's highest court, three
are CFR members: Sandra Day O'Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen G.
Breyer.

Checks and balances? The CFR doesn't worry about them at all. But every
American should carefully consider James Madison's warning.



Grip on the Mass Media

Why are Americans unaware of the enormous clout possessed by the CFR? How can
it be that an organization formed to undo the American dream and lead this
nation into a one-world Marxist nightmare can achieve such a controlling
influence without the people knowing about it? Why hasn't the supposedly
tough and courageous mass media informed the people about this subversive
takeover?

The answer, very simply, is that the CFR dominates the mass media, which only
rarely reports anything about the organization. The names of hundreds of
media executives and journalists can be found on the CFR membership roster.
On October 30, 1993, Washington Post columnist Richard Harwood detailed the
CFR's domination of his own profession in his column entitled "Ruling Class
Journalists." While never condemning what he was reporting and likely
steering ambitious individuals toward the Council, Harwood characterized CFR
members as "the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the United
States."

He wrote: "In the past 15 years, council directors have included Hedley
Donovan of Time Inc., Elizabeth Drew of the New Yorker, Philip Geyelin of The
Washington Post, Karen Elliott House of the Wall Street Journal, and Strobe
Talbott of Time magazine, who is now President Clinton's (Deputy Secretary of
State).

The editorial page editor, deputy editorial page editor, executive editor,
managing editor, foreign editor, national affairs editor, business and
financial editor and various writers as well as Katharine Graham, the paper's
principal owner, represent The Washington Post in the council's membership.

The executive editor, managing editor and foreign editor of the New York
Times are members, along with the executives of such other large newspapers
as the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, the weekly news magazines,
network television executives and celebrities, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Jim
Lehrer, for example, and various columnists, among them Charles Krauthammer,
William Buckley, George Will and Jim Hoagland."

The Council repeatedly denies that it sets policy for our nation. Yet, while
discussing our nation's changing foreign policy, CFR Chairman Peter G.
Peterson stated in the organization's 1989 Annual Report that "the Board of
Directors and the staff of the Council have decided that this institution
should play a leadership role in defining these new foreign policy agenda."

Our question is simply: How can an organization define an agenda for the
nation without taking a stand or advocating a policy? The answer is that it
can't. Any claim from the CFR that it is merely a debating forum open to all
ideas is absurd. Even Richard Harwood knows this. In his Washington Post
article mentioned previously, he wrote that the CFR journalists he listed "do
not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy; they help make it."

The actual content of meetings held at the group's headquarters and elsewhere
remains a closely guarded secret. According to CFR bylaws, it is an "express
condition of membership" that members refrain from disclosing in any way what
goes on at Council meetings. Any action contravening this rule "may be
regarded by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion as ground for
termination or suspension of membership."

Yet, cabinet officials, members of Congress, high- ranking military officers,
and other government officials repeatedly participate at CFR functions. Such
"confidential" gatherings under the aegis of a private organization
(especially one founded by an individual whose goal was "Socialism as dreamed
of by Karl Marx") are totally inconsistent with proper conduct in a free
country.

No CFR member is ever directly instructed to hold any particular view.
Instead, government officials and media personalities supply important
respectability for favored positions, and render varying degrees of disdain
or contempt for the opposite view. Ambitious politicians, journalists,
corporate executives, professors, and others dutifully follow the lead set
for them, frequently without ever knowing whose attitude they are parroting.
In this way, an agenda is indeed set and policies are established. As a rule,
slight variations on most topics are tolerated, even welcomed. But advocacy
of any position outside carefully drawn limits earns scorn and ridicule. For
example, discussion about increasing or decreasing U.S. funding for either
the United Nations or a variety of foreign aid projects is tolerated, even
welcomed. But anyone who calls for U.S. withdrawal from the world body, or
who recommends that all foreign aid be terminated, jeopardizes his or her
reputation with the nation's most prestigious power brokers.

Those who read CFR publications and study the editorial stance of
CFR-controlled media organs know exactly which are the favored attitudes. The
CFR and several like-minded groups can be expected to support the following:
more pacts, treaties, and agreements that compromise U.S. sovereignty;
continued praise for and reliance on the United Nations; piecemeal transfer
of U.S military forces to UN supervision and command; more and newer forms of
foreign aid; undermining and isolation of any national leader who does not
favor socialism and world government under a "new world order"; and
submission to the radical demands of environmental extremists, population
planners, and human rights crusaders who will never be satisfied until the
United States no longer exists as a free and independent nation.

Some who follow the lead of the Establishment are undoubtedly committed to
the world government and socialism advocated by Marx and the CFR's founders.
But most who toe this line are self-promoters who are interested only in re-
election, advancement, and recognition. They care little or nothing about the
Constitution, their fellow citizens, and freedom in general.



The Shadows of Power

A thoroughly revealing history of the Council on Foreign Relations and its
responsibility for America's decline is available in researcher James
Perloff's superb book, The Shadows of Power. Unlike others who have sought to
warn the American people about the pervasive power of the CFR, Mr. Perloff
studied the organization's publications from its inception in 1921. The
evidence he supplies to support his condemnation is taken from the CFR
itself. His important book concludes that the CFR is a major participant in
an ongoing conspiratorial drive to use the U.S. government and the wealth of
the American people to create power over mankind for a few diabolically
driven individuals.

Mr. Perloff is careful to point out that only some of the CFR's members are
completely committed to the sinister goals he exposes. He believes that many
CFR members, and many others who follow the group's lead, would readily
switch their allegiance should widespread awareness be created about this
powerful organization's history and designs


--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrCn8.bWdS6o.d2JhY29u
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to