On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:15:29AM +0200 I heard the voice of Rhialto, and lo! it spake thus: > > That's fine with me. Unless we think that in 10 years there will be > another different standard to follow perhaps ...
Possible. Though it'd probably be 20 before we got around to it ;) It's a fair point that it might be handy to have it nicely differentiated, particularly if some day we decide to retire it. Dunno how well we'd really manage to have both cases solidly working long-term; I have a feeling some bits will creep outside of ifdefs just through attrition over time. Maybe that's not a big deal. P'raps after settling switching it around to #ifndef NO_EWMH rather than #ifdef EWMH. On the theory that it gets us closer to "normal builds require no -D's". A long discussion could probably be had about our existing long-standing options like that; maybe we'll have it at some point. > And I have the impression that nothing looks at the GNOME1 > properties any more so it's pretty much a waste of time. I would think it might still be used by GTK1 apps. Of which there are few still in use, but probably not quite none (xmms, frex; I still have it around on several machines). > (I'm off for a few days, so I wo't reply to emails for a bit) Away... from... email? I don't understand ;) -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [email protected] Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
