In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:33:56 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Gro�johann) said:
kai.grossjohann> Rudolph T Maceyko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: kai.grossjohann> kai.grossjohann> > What do you have against m4? I use it on a routine basis with ctwm kai.grossjohann> > and am quite happy. kai.grossjohann> kai.grossjohann> It's nice but not an extension language. The closest kai.grossjohann> thing that ctwm has to an extension language is the kai.grossjohann> f.function thing. True. However, the CTWM configuration language is exactly that, rather than an extension language. This demands some thinking... -- Richard Levitte | http://richard.levitte.org/ | Spannv. 38, I Levitte Programming | http://www.lp.se/ | S-168 35 Bromma T: +46-708-26 53 44 | | SWEDEN "Price, performance, quality... choose the two you like"
