On Sat 08 Mar 2003 at 12:25:04 +0100, Rudolph T Maceyko via RT wrote: > If you really want to remove the -s option, surely you can do so > without invoking cat and the shell...? :-) Just remove the "-s" > element from the arguments to execlp.
Eh yes, you're absolutely right :) Somehow I thought that if m4 was invoked with 2 filenames it would try to write the output to the second. I don't know how I came to that conclusion, other than that it was late... > But I think perhaps you really want to add an option to m4 (or a > built-time test) to control this behavior. Those of us whose m4 > supports -s appreciate the ability of ctwm to issue diagnostic messages > with the correct line number in .ctwmrc... Indeed, that would be better. My manpage didn't even mention -s so I was assuming it was for overcoming that problem I believed to exist. > Rudy -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- The evil eye is caused by the black \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- tongue - Tom Poes, "Het boze oog", 4456.
