Honestly, I think 3.7 should just be quitely dropped and we should restart from 3.6, apply all the bugfix patches and possibly some of well-tested and known-to-be-OK improvements and call this release 3.8.
Then, with the new 3.8 as baseline, people can re-submit whatever patches didn't make it into 3.8. /Bj�rn On 21 Feb 2005 00:35, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > [since this discussion isn't really about the reported bug, I'm moving > it off ctwm-bugs] > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:14:52 -0600, "Matthew > D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > fullermd> I think we should have a bug fix release called "3.7" 8-} > > That's a point, except we already have a 3.7 alpha (that needs to be > updated and fixed), which feels as much like a bug introduction > release as it would be a bug fix release. There are a lot of changes > between 3.6 and 3.7, and I'm not sure I've caught up on what they all > really do... > > Cheers, > Richard > > ----- > Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. > See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. > > -- > Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://richard.levitte.org/ > > "When I became a man I put away childish things, including > the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." > -- C.S. Lewis
