On Wed, Jun 06, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote about "Re: [ctwm] Modifying the modifiers for bindings...": > Well, with my new syntax suggestion, it's still possible to retain the > old syntax for a while, possibly with BIG LETTER WARNINGS that the old > syntax is going to disappear with version 4.0.
Yes. Though as I mentioned you don't really have to (you can, but don't have to) invent the new "+" syntax, if you think the " " syntax (which also works and always did) looks good enough. If you think it is good enough, the manual page can recommend using space (not the vertical bar) for the "and" of several modifiers, and it will no longer look inconsistent (on what a vertical bar means) as it does now. The new "," syntax isn't strictly necessary, because as you said it is just a shortcut for several identical lines. Do you expect this to be a useful shortcut? Why would anyone want to bind "Either control-A or alt-shift-A" to a certain action? Or am I missing an important use case? -- Nadav Har'El | Wednesday, Jun 6 2007, 21 Sivan 5767 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |"Computers are useless. They can only http://nadav.harel.org.il |give you answers." -- Pablo Picasso
