On Fri 02 May 2014 at 08:50:57 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Welcome to the new ctwm mailing list! > > Yay!
Seconded! Just now I have finally pushed the remaining OnTopPriority changes to my branch (ctwm.rhialto.cleanup). Yay! I had hoped to do it yesterday, but I ran into a couple of scenarios I hadn't tried before, which then tripped the consistency check. As before, it was about some assumptions that the check made which aren't always true if you use virtual screens, but also cases where the virtual screen code simply wasn't as consistent as could be wished. I think I've cleaned it up considerably in this regard. That alone is probably a good enough reason to use it. I've made it do multiple levels of consistency checking. At the default level it does some checks and terminates with a message if they fail. At debug level it prints a lot of tracing messages and does extra checking. And for production use (-DNDEBUG) the checks would be omitted entirely. (Even if they should fail, at worst the depth arrangement would be wonky). So now I have to resist the urge to do more twiddling... so that the bzr conversion can happen in peace. > Stefan -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- The Doctor: No, 'eureka' is Greek for \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- 'this bath is too hot.'
pgp9y9JT8eQeh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
