On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Sukender wrote:
My arguments in favor of SVN are: - switching from CVS is very easy
You're clearly not the one who runs, uses or writes the scripts we have today that use CVS. While easy to switch, it is still work and I this far I've found other matters in my life mort important to spend that time and energy on.
I don't find CVS very awkward for our use.
- SVN+CMake+CDash may be a candidate tool chain
We may change versioning system at some point but it might not be to SVN. And we can provide the ability to build libcurl with cmake completely independent of that.
And I don't even know what CDash is...
Conclusion: Why changing something that already works? Well... I think switching may be possible in the future, but not right now.
I think that's pretty exactly what I've said. I know there are more advanced tools - I am a contributor in at least two of those projects.
-- / daniel.haxx.se
