2009/6/11, John E. Malmberg wrote: > > I wonder why curlmsg_vms.h has no header inclusion guard. It would > > make things a little bit more easy... Would there be any problem if it > > were used? > > I suspect that they are not there because the original author did not think > to put them in. I can not see how they would hurt.
I've just added header inclusion guards for curlmsg_vms.h, curlmsg.h and config-vms.h lets hope it doesn't break anything. Do you have some way of testing if the curlmsg.msg is still in sync with curl.h, and dependant files curlmsg_vms.h, curlmsg.h? -- -=[Yang]=-
