On 12/19/2010 07:35 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Stefan Krause wrote:
Yes that's exactly what I meant. It could be clarified that this
would allow multiple pipelines to the _same_ target host. It already
supports multiple pipelines if you just use different host names.
Multiple pipelines to the same target host are then ok, as the user
explicitly chose a dedicated local port binding. Especially, in case
a custom IP routing based on local ports is applied, it is necessary
to use the local ports as configured, as otherwise a source port
based routing is not possible,because the source ports may differ
from the configured ones.
Do you plan to make this change ?
I think we should, as I consider the current way sort of a bug.
But if I personally am gonna do it, I don't know. It's the usual story
with all of us being volunteers here and none of us have time and yet
there are many people who want things done and all bugs to get fixed.
I will probably get to it if nobody else does.
I can give it a try. Can you point me the file where the connection
stuff is located? For the change I think using using the current head
revision is best or should I base it on the latest release? How it will
then be integrated? Do I send a patch to you or what is the way to go here?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
