On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Vincent Torri <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > . So I would say: > > > > * the autotools > > * a Makefile for vc++ > > * drop cmake > > CMake support has maintainers and they do a great job, I don't see why > it should be dropped :) > quote from Daniel Stenberg: "libcurl's cmake support is also flaky, at best, and I was told the other day that it is broken again. We simply don't have anyone around closely enough to maintain the cmake build at a good quality." Also, what is the interest of having several build systems for a library ? The autotools provide a tarball with a shell script which can be used anywhere. It is sufficient. > > simple enough, and not too much work to maintain. You can even cross > compile > > libcurl for Windows CE with the autotools (maybe) :p > > > Btw, if you like or need to, we can add the CE builds options for the > makefile as well. But I will need some hands for that, as I do not > develop for CE. > I use cegcc for cross compilation. Vincent Torri
------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
