On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Daniel Stenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jan 2011, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > > Using my approach, the same llist unittest series could be written like >> the attached file - consider it an example, we can of course tweak the >> details as we think and move ahead. Isn't that good enough? It then also >> works with our current infrastructure perfectly, with things such as >> valgrind, gdb and our own memory leak tool and more. >> > > To put the code where my mouth is, the attached patch is a working version > of the same llist set of tests adjusted to my way of thinking. > > Isn't this "good enough" as a first shot and then we can polish this from > here? > if you prefer rewriting stuff that others have already written, then fine. Vincent Torri
------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
