On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Michael Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8 January 2011 10:21, Vincent Torri <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Graeme Burton < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> I'm using Visual Studio 2005. > >> > >> I'm using the wcecomp library of Maurice Kalinowski, and I had to make a > >> few minor changes to the properties as I'm trying to build a static > library > >> rather than a DLL. > >> > >> The code compiles and builds without error, but doesn't run properly, > >> which prompted my questions about unit tests. > >> > >> As I said, I'll document all the changes I made once I've got it > working. > > > > I just looked at wcecompat and remarked that it is released under the > LGPL > > licence. libcurl is released under the MIT/X based licence. Which means > > that any code that is using wcecompat will be LGPL. > > This is not true. The LGPL says: > > [...] > 6. As an exception to the Sections above, you may also combine or link > a "work that uses the Library" with the Library to produce a work > containing portions of the Library, and distribute that work under > terms of your choice, provided that the terms permit modification of > the work for the customer's own use and reverse engineering for > debugging such modifications. > [...] > > "... distribute that work under terms of your choice ..." means it > does not have to be LGPL, but of course there are restrictions. > ha, indeed. Thanks for the clarification. Vincent Torri
------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
