Hi Daniel, 2012/6/11 Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se>: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Marc Hoersken wrote: > >> Therefore I am attaching a complete new set of patches that differs >> after 38984c2775651c8fb675528b20fa8d54ba43e2c6 (patch 0022). >> Sorry for the inconvenience. >> >> Please drop the old set and use the new one. > > > Thanks for your hard work on this! I've merged this into a local branch of > mine (with some manual fiddles due to the CRLF newlines in some files) and > I've done some small local cleanups.
You're welcome! I had quite a lot of fun creating this. :-) Did you use the latest set of patch files? Actually that set shouldn't contain CRLF newline issues anymore. If it does, please tell me the location so that I can fix it on my branch and provide a new patch file. I am also very interested in the small local cleanups. ;-) I would to make sure that changes created due to misunderstandings or similiar make it into the master. > A question I have is about the removal of CURL_VERSION_SSPI. What's the gain > in removing this bit? We're set to keep the API backwards compatible so we > better not remove the definition from the header file, but won't there also > be one or a few applications existing that actually checks that bit to see > if libcurl is built with SSPI? I didn't implement this change, but maybe Steve is able to elaborate a little bit on this part. Best regards, Marc ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html