Hi everyone, 2012/6/28 Yang Tse <[email protected]>: > Yes, yes. I'm certainly in favour of that. Although I want explicit > approval on this thread from Marc Hoersken in order to interpret his > proposal in this way, given that his proposal would be affected by > this.
Of course I would like the proposed literals to fit into the corresponding configuration scheme. --with-SCHANNEL or --with-WINDOWS-SSL really doesn't make any sense. For my proposal this would mean, as you proposed: [Config_Literal="SCHANNEL"] configure: --with-schannel other: WITH_SCHANNEL or ENABLE_SCHANNEL [Config_Literal="WINDOWS_SSL"] configure: --with-windows-ssl or --with-winssl (short form, corresponding to other parameters) other: WITH_WINDOWS_SSL or ENABLE_WINDOWS_SSL We have to apply common sense and the logical restrictions applied by the environment. Best regards, Marc ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
