On 11-10-12 21:05, Peter Sylvester wrote: >> Please set CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER to 0L too. That will probably do the trick. > disabling checks of authenticity is not exactly a good advice IMHO.
IMHO it's never a good idea disable any of the two. But who am I to judge on disabling security features to make stuff work on request? ;-) As I interpreted the original request it was only to satisfy the requirement of making functional encrypted connection without security. >> Creating a self-signed certificate in a more standardized way is not to >> hard. There is sufficient information available that fits your working >> environment in the best possible way. > There is no such such thing as a 'more standardised' way. > if one gets something different than snake oil without > state and location ... :-) LOL! Well, what I wished to imply here was to point to the certificate RFCs and the requirements of a valid X.509 v3 certificate. Not having a subject in a CA certificate will not make it an X.509v3 certificate with a CA purpose. My apologies for the ill communication. ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
