As a user of libcurl, I've expressed a preference for the renaming. However, it's only my two cents' worth; I don't know enough about the version control situation, or other implications, to make a formal vote or recommendation, sorry!
Tom On Jan 5, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Yang Tse <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi friends, > > Updated list of those who have expressed their opinion on reverting > the lib/*.[ch] renaming, after I said that the reversion commit is > ready for pushing and requested reassurance on pushing it or not: > > Marc Hoersken - Don't revert renaming. > Dave Reisner - Push reversion commit. > Oscar Koeroo - Don't revert renaming. > Steve Holme - Push reversion commit. > Yang Tse - Don't revert renaming. > Tor Arntsen - Push reversion commit. > Gisle Vanem - Push reversion commit. > Dan Fandrich - Push reversion commit. > > I would appreciate this list gets populated, at least, with every > one's name which have posted in this thread. In case I've > misinterpreted the decision of anyone listed above, please speak up > and I'll fix as desired. > > Notice that the final decision on this may be holding back or blocking > others work. So, either way, we should sort it out as soon as > possible. > > Thanks, > -- > -=[Yang]=- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library > Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html > 文林 Wenlin Institute, Inc. Software for Learning Chinese E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.wenlin.com Telephone: 1-877-4-WENLIN (1-877-493-6546) ☯ ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
