hi Gisle,
On 10.04.2013 12:37, Gisle Vanem wrote:
"Guenter" <li...@gknw.net> wrote:
How can USE_THREADS_WIN32 both be defined and set to 0?
The "&& USE_THREADS_WIN32 == 0" part is superfluous AFAICS.
well, simply by -DUSE_THREADS_WIN32=0 ...
I think you know I already knew that.
sorry; I didnt think further about, but that was just the answer to your
question as I understood it;
and to be 100% sure I quickly checked it with the test sample ...
also I wouldnt be much surprised if the test sample would give other
results with other preprocessors than the one from gcc ...
Just that it's highly suspicious
that it was needed. I forgot the reason behind this and possibly in some
time, nobody will understand the historic reason.
honestly I'm not happy with that hack, and if someone has something
better in mind please speak up!
Me neither. That's why I reacted on this tree-state logic.
lets 1st get the pending release out of the door;
the current 'logic' seems at least to work better than what we had
before; and after the release we should check for a better solution like
Yang suggested - but that would then cause to modify all Windows static
makefiles, and a bunch of testing would then be required too (for which
I have not the time ATM).
Gün.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
