On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Patrick Monnerat wrote:
I'm about to move all TLS related functions into its own subdir, named
vtls.
Good idea, providing it remains a subdir of lib and not a separate dll
(not like c-ares).
Right, I'd like that to remain as well and I have no plans to change it.
Although I'd also not want to make any long-term promises to that end since I
could agree to something else if there was a greater benefit to gain for us.
Let's not take that discussion too far now though, we'll certainly not do
anything drastic in the short term anyway.
My 2 cents: can have generic tls and related in vtls, and each different
connector in a separate subdir of vtls...
Really? How would that improve things exactly? Is that just your personal
preference or do you have a technical reason for it?
BTW: I'll give some more time to allow others to speak up, object or comment
this idea before I push this change.
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
