On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Ulrich Telle wrote:
>> Do you think it is worth passing a flag into those functions and >> setting the ISC_REQ_ flags if that flag is set - for the email >> protocols for example or not? > > For the calls in curl_ntlm_msgs.c I probably wouldn't do that. However, I'm > no Windows SSPI expert. Fair enough - functionally from my own testing there didn't seem much point but thought I would ask in case you or anyone else had any views. >> However, I have just tested this against and Exchange 2013 server with >> both single sign on and a specific user account (both with and without >> the domain) and all three tests succeeded with the ISQ_REQ_ flags as >> zero. >> >> Are you up to providing a patch - I can do it but it is your find so I >> would rather you are credited for the work ;-) > > I just submitted a patch to the curl-library list. :-) Thank you... I tidied up the commit message and some line lengths to make better use of the 80 character limit we have but have now pushed your patch as commiit 8ee182288a. > Thanks again for bearing with me throughout the process to analyze and to > finally fix the problem! No problem - thank you for your bug report and for ultimately resolving the issue ;-) Kind Regards Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
