Guten Tag Daniel Stenberg, am Dienstag, 29. September 2015 um 08:45 schrieben Sie:
> I'm fine with either. Can you clarify exactly how this would work with patch? I've attached the following, which fixes the access violation without manually defining HAVE_LONGLONG. > Index: config-win32.h > =================================================================== > --- config-win32.h (Revision 4088) > +++ config-win32.h (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -481,8 +481,9 @@ > #endif > > /* Define if the compiler supports the 'long long' data type. */ > -#if defined(__MINGW32__) || defined(__WATCOMC__) || \ > - (defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER >= 1310)) > +#if defined(__MINGW32__) || defined(__WATCOMC__) || \ > + (defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER >= 1310)) || \ > + (defined(__BORLANDC__) && (__BORLANDC__ >= 0x561)) > #define HAVE_LONGLONG 1 > #endif Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail: [email protected] AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
config-win32.h.patch
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
