On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:36:37AM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Dan Fandrich wrote: > >Commit 64e959ff removed most of the TODO comments in the code because "They > >tend to never get updated anyway so they're frequently inaccurate and we > >never > >go back to revisit them anyway." I disagree with this removal. > > Okay, I hear you. I got annoyed by some that clearly were inaccurate/old and > then it struck me that these comments tend to get added to the code and then > never get updated. I probably overreacted when I removed all of them like > that. Thanks for speaking up. > > I'll revert that patch now and I'll instead address the particular ones I > think are the most wrong to start with. In the long run I think we're better > off adding issues to the TODO and KNOWN_BUGS documents so that they're > easier to find.
I agree that some of them are wish list items that could easily be tracked separately, but I'm glad to see the rest have made it back in! >>> Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
