On 3 Nov 2016, at 15:44, Simon Josefsson wrote: > If you have more ideas on why the above is wrong, or what could > realistically be implemented in a network application, that would be > interesting to discuss. > > I know we both are aware that this is just a rehash of the discussion > that went on while IDNA2008 was being specified. So let's not end up > in the same loop. The problems brought up then are still valid though, > and TR46 was developed as a response to those concerns.
I did not respond to the rest of your mail, sorry. I am still of the view that the longer people wait to adopt IDNA2008 and forget IDNA2003, the more problems we get. paf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
