On 6/2/2018 8:20 AM, Patrick Monnerat wrote:
This is true for third party libraries, not for those provided as a part of the OS. Is cURL a benefit to commercial platforms for free ? If yes, by following your above statement, we should stop supporting them.

Don't take these words too strictly: I have been absurdly extremist only for the purpose of demonstration ;-) All this stuff is a matter of compromises.
I package (for AIX), and try to support by reporting test failures (much different than bug reporting, imho) and I package from the perspective that the dependencies should be as small as possible - ideally none.

As to OS400 (IBM i would be better these days) support and TLS weaknesses. Quick question: could you use PACE and maybe openssl.base for AIX - and my package? If yes, then that may be a solution for weak TLS support in IBM i.

Cases like this are not curl's to solve. When the OS provider is not resolving it - this is not a responsibility for curl. Maybe it is a responsibility, or better a service, a packager provides. Daniel, e,g,. is usually friendly enough to assist with understanding possible solutions. Again, that does not make it his responsibility for permanent maint, or even inclusion in curl.

my two bits,
Michael

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:   https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html

Reply via email to