Den lör 5 feb. 2022 kl 10:52 skrev Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se>:

> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022, Henrik Holst wrote:
>
> > The remaining 109 for google.com and hostmatch() requires a very
> intrusive
> > patch however since it would require to add a size_t to struct hostname
> (aka
> > add Howard Chu:s berval string) and that struct is used _alot_ (which
> also
> > means that there can be other winnings down the line besides the
> certcheck
> > since the hostname length is probably used a bit).
>
> I'm not convinced that's a change we want. We need to remember that these
> are
> "just" calls to strlen() and typically for very short strings. If we can't
> measure a performance impact, we shouldn't do changes that make the code
> hard to read or "unusual".
>

I hear what you say, however I don't know if adding a size_t hostlen to the
hostname struct would
make the code hard to read or unusual.

Anyway, I will take a look at it first and then come back with more info
and you can all decide then if
the proposed changes are too hard to read or unusual, I have no problem
doing some some work that
in the end will be rejected.

/HH

>
> --
>
>   / daniel.haxx.se
>   | Commercial curl support up to 24x7 is available!
>   | Private help, bug fixes, support, ports, new features
>   | https://curl.se/support.html
>
-- 
Unsubscribe: https://lists.haxx.se/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:   https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html

Reply via email to