On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 5:31 PM Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2024, David Pfitzner via curl-library wrote: > > > From testing, this change appears to be due to this commit: > > > > > https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/db5c9f4f9e0779b49624752b135281a0717b277b > > So just reverting this single commit makes it "good" again? > Correct. > > > Perhaps it would be useful for a user of libcurl to be able to (somehow) > > control this tradeoff between rate-limiting accuracy and CPU usage? > > Perhaps getting more data would be a first step. How big difference in > rate-limit accuracy does this commit make in your case? > > I have not looked at that carefully, but casually I don't see much difference if any. But possibly closer inspection may find a systematic difference. I also suspect one may see bigger differences in some regime different to what I'm looking at - eg, smaller files. -- David
-- Unsubscribe: https://lists.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.html
