On Oct 9, 2013, at 1:23 AM, Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:21:16PM -0400, Dennis Ferguson wrote: >> While looking for something to compile a tree with some m68k bits >> added I found that a successful build of evbcf needs the changes >> below. The problems seem related to the binutils changes. > > Can you please provide a bit more details? I'm a bit puzzled how > -fommit-frame-pointer would interfere with new binutils (and if it > does, isn't that a gcc bug we should fix instead)? This is a gcc bug. I'm assuming that __asm & unwind-tables don't mix.
