On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Ryota Ozaki <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Andreas Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Greg Troxel wrote: >>> The releng tests aren't finishing either: >>> >>> http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/i386/commits-2014.07.html#end >> >> The i386 runs aren't finishing, but the amd64 ones are. >> Before ozaki-r's commits, there were 29 failures: >> >> >> http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/amd64/build/2014.07.02.00.15.41/test.html >> >> And after the commits, there are 88 failures: >> >> >> http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/amd64/build/2014.07.02.09.51.08/test.html >> >> The fs/nfs/t_rquotad tests are timing out, and many other NFS related >> tests are failing with >> >> panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "curcpu() == ci" failed > > Thank you for your investigation. The rump kernel seems to be > compiled unexpectedly with the code supposed to be for normal kernels. > ifdef added by me in the commit > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/net/pktqueue.c.diff?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 > was wrong. Looking at sys/rump/Makefile.rump, _RUMPKERNEL is defined > for most architectures, however, not for x86. > > I'll confirm my guess is correct and fix it if so.
http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/i386/commits-2014.07.html#end I committed the patch and now the number of failures has been back to the original degree. Regards, ozaki-r > > Thanks, > ozaki-r > >> >> -- >> Andreas Gustafsson, [email protected]
