On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:23:22PM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote: > The test code still indicates that these tests are expected to fail for > udf, however the tests are actually passing successfully (at least in my > amd64 test-bed). [1] > > Have these tests been fixed (perhaps by accident)? Or, if they are still > expected to fail, do we have any other explanation of why they're not > failing?
A test run I did around the same time you posted this included both fs/vfs/t_renamerace:udf_renamerace and fs/vfs/t_renamerace:udf_renamerace_dirs in the *un*expected failures output. FWIW. As far as I know udf hasn't been fixed (or touched at all in quite a while) -- David A. Holland [email protected]
