Jeff Rizzo wrote: >On 7/21/14, 4:28 AM, Nick Hudson wrote: >> >> >> IMO, non-earm ABI builds should be dropped in favour of earm and a >> subset of evbarm earm variants should be made available. >> > >This seems reasonable, and I am also going to suggest that the defaults >change on those ports which are switching to EABI.
[snip] >So, what I am proposing: >- hpcarm, iyonix, zaurus switch to MACHINE_ARCH=earm (which is >equivalent to earmv5, correct?) I would prefer hpcarm to switch to MACHINE_ARCH=earmv4 Robert Swindells
