Sorry, that "no wsdisplay" was my future _plan_, not suggestion. It doesn't work yet.
I'm really impressed by people's craftmanship to reduce kernel size by enumerating uncountable "no" options. But I want to make it much simpler and easier to use. I hope you will not complain. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:15 PM, John D. Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > Un-modularizing wscons via this commit: > > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2014/10/17/msg059544.html > > fixed the issue for my sparc custom kernels. Prior to that, I'd tried > what was suggested in the commit message, but it appears that if one > uses an enumerator one must also specify the attachment. So, > > no wsdisplay* > > causes 'config' to complain about "unknown attachment" while > > no wsdisplay > > was accepted (but failed to exclude wsdisplay). > > -- > |/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS NetBSD Darwin/MacOS X > |\ / jdbaker[snail]mylinuxisp[flyspeck]com OpenBSD FreeBSD > | X No HTML/proprietary data in email. BSD just sits there and works! > |/ \ GPGkeyID: D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4 BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645 >
