> On Nov 2, 2014, at 2:29 AM, Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:23:58AM -0800, John Nemeth wrote: >> (64-bit ARM). This means that it will be boot code for several >> types of systems, and it will be the first quasi-MI bootcode. As >> such, there is no existing obvious place for where to put it. Let >> the bikeshedding begin... > > I would create subdirectories under something like: > > src/sys/arch/common/stand/uefi > > Happy to see progress over what we have for ia64 (which doesn't work on > my hardware). Will there be some way for the (early) kernel to use uefi > console services before the kernel attaches a working console?
Why not just sys/stand/uefi?
