Hi Alan
On 2015-04-13 06:54, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Paul Goyette wrote:
I can confirm that this patch works on my tun device (carrying ipv6
inside ipv4).
This patch is not sufficient for my IPv6 tunnel.
...
This is on an i386 system, running a kernel from 2015-04-07 00:00 UTC
(with the one line patch to route.c that Roy posted), but with
userland from 2015-01-27 00:00 UTC. A kernel from 2015-01-27 00:00
UTC does not have this problem.
Can you discard the prior patches from Robert myself and just apply the
latest one I posted please - it affects more than just route.c
NOTE - this patch ONLY affects local route creation for the address
assigned to the interface, it has zero to do with the default route or
anything else.
Roy
