On 27/04/2015 12:16, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Apr 24, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Christos Zoulas <[email protected]> > wrote: >> One of my ISProviders is TWC. If you don't use DHCPv6, what you end >> up is the link-local address for each interface (which you get >> anyway), and a default route to the link-local address of the TWC >> router (through RA's), which is not useful if you don't have a >> real IPv6 address on any of your interfaces. >> >> This made things work very slowly, because everything tried IPv6 >> first because of the default route (until it timed-out). > > Shouldn't the link-local address fail source address selection? It > might be interesting to try to figure out exactly how this is > happening. It seems like a fail to try to use an IPv6 default route > when you have no valid source address candidates. >
This is a good idea and would also fix a similar issue I reported here: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-net/2015/04/02/msg005025.html Roy
