On Tue 24 Nov 2015 at 06:54:09 +0000, Michael van Elst wrote: > N.B. nanosleep shouldn't be based on ticks.
I agree. I found that I get much better precision if I simply subtract 1/HZ seconds from the time I want to sleep, since that always gets added in practice. But user programs should not need to do that (not need to find out the value of HZ). -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- The Doctor: No, 'eureka' is Greek for \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- 'this bath is too hot.'
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
