On Jun 2, 7:31am, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote: -- Subject: Re: nfs client kernel crash
| > See PR/40491. I don't think that the mutex there is correct. It seems | > that in other places the nfs_reqq is protected with splsoftnet(). | > | The PR is for netbsd-5 and is some years old. Do it make sense to create a | new bug report for netbsd-7? Sure, and close 40491 saying superceded by the new one. christos
