Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:53:06 +0100
From: Kamil Rytarowski <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
| I will extend our ATF tests to validate it.
That's good. But test for getting ECHILD from waitpid() - it is fairly
clear that is what should happen.
I am currently testing a fix, but I won't commit it (if it works)
until I hear from the austin group people (posix spec maintainers)
on what is intended for waitid() so if needed, it can be adjusted too.
>From reading the spec, it may be that 0 is correct from waitid(), it may
be that ECHILD is correct, and if an incorrect pid is passed (which is
also ECHILD from waitpid() - test that one as well .. just specify any > 0
pid arg to waitpid() when the process has no children) it may be that
waitid() is supposed to return EINVAL (just to be different from waitpid() ...)
kre
