On Apr 9, 4:32pm, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote: -- Subject: Re: npf bug(?)
| On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Christos Zoulas wrote: | | > | > | Thanks for the patch. For me it works very well. | > | > Well, the question is do you need it? I.e. why don't you let the v4 | > traffic flow through npf? Is it a performance issue or doesn't npf | > do reassembly correctly? | | I'm not sure if the reassembling works properly. After a few hours the | statistics showed over 7000 failed reassembly but only 1296 fragments | with 1104 reassembled. I find these numbers unusual. I also know no way to | check if the reassembly works correctly. So I would like to disable packet | reassembly. Perhaps you get a lot of dup fragments? netstat -s should show you the stack's reassembly and fragment stats. Perhaps those agree with what npf shows? christos
