Martin Husemann writes: > [Updating from 5 to 6 and then 7 ends up with libdrm.so from 6] > > The definitive answer should be in the set lists, see below for various > branches: > > src-5/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.2.4 > src-6-0/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2 > src-6-1/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2 > src-6/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.3 > src-7-0/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2 > src-7-1/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2 > src-7/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.2 > src/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi:./usr/X11R7/lib/libdrm.so.3.4 > > So: yes, something looks wrong in -6. It comes from: > > Update libdrm to 2.4.36. > Enable radeon KMS support in xf86-video-ati so that a netbsd-6 > userland will work with a more recent (netbsd-7 and up) kernel. > [mrg, ticket #1326] > > Matt, erroneous bump in that ticket, or some pullup missing for -7? > We may have to teach postinstall about it, but that would be a pain.
i'm not sure. i guess missing pullup, but i'd have to check the whole thing to be sure. .mrg.
