On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:02:13AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> errno = 0;
> t = mktime(&tms);
> ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO(0, t != (time_t)-1);
I guess the author meant to write:
errno = 0;
t = mktime(&tms);
ATF_REQUIRE(errno == 0;
ATF_REQUIRE(t != (time_t)-1);
(not judging on the validity this test would have)
> I'd expect ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO() to be used when testing for expected known
> failure, like if you were to do
>
> res = unlink("/tmp/no/such/file");
>
> you'd expect res == -1, and errno == ENOENT, so you'd write
>
> ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO(ENOENT, res == -1);
Exactly that is the intended use.
Martin
