In article <[email protected]>, Robert Elz <[email protected]> wrote: > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:48:22 +0000 (UTC) > From: NetBSD Test Fixture <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > | The newly failing test case is: > | lib/libc/locale/t_strfmon:strfmon > >I have been looking into this new test failure, and I believe I >have convinced myself that the test is simply wrong - it is testing >for what was a bug in our previous strfmon() function, which has >recently been corrected. > >So I plan on updating the test to test the output that should appear >(from my reading of what the posix spec for strfmon requires) rather >than what happened to appear in the past. > >I will also fix a piece of utter nonsense (obvious nonsense) in the >man page, but that's a less important issue (most people reading it >would notice that what it says cannot be what it means, and they'd >be right.)
Sorry, I forgot to fix the test; yes the previous test was wrong and the current output is correct. christos
