blah, oops. Given the comment I'm not sure ulonglong_t is even
necessary, it doesn't appear anywhere.
Does reverting the previous and adding this (which upstream might
accept, they seem to just forget to remove it) help?
Works for building tools under netbsd.
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/rpc/types.h,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 types.h
--- ./osnet/dist/uts/common/rpc/types.h 10 Apr 2015 22:44:20 -0000 1.2
+++ ./osnet/dist/uts/common/rpc/types.h 12 Jun 2018 21:55:19 -0000
@@ -49,13 +49,6 @@
typedef int bool_t;
typedef int enum_t;
- * The ulonglong_t type was introduced to workaround an rpcgen bug
- * that has been fixed, this next typedef will be removed in a future release.
- * Do *NOT* use!
-typedef u_longlong_t ulonglong_t;
#if defined(_LP64) || defined(_I32LPx)
typedef uint32_t rpcprog_t;
typedef uint32_t rpcvers_t;